It has been a difficult few weeks at work. I’ve always believed that there are very few things that you cannot achieve if you want it bad enough, and try hard enough for it. Both of which depends on the mind. You’ll want something bad enough if you have clarity of the role it plays in the scheme of your life. And you’ll be able to try hard enough if your mind is strong enough, unbeatable by stress or setbacks. As such, I’ve always placed a huge emphasis on the mind, as I’m convinced every battle in life is won or lost there. Of course there are always limits. I can never be Muhammad Ali or Stephen Hawking no matter how hard I try, but most things in life do not require the insane physical or intellectual abilities of Ali’s and Hawking’s. Most things, and certainly those of a corporate nature, are a function of effort and drive, I think. Because of this belief, it’s quite difficult for me to be deterred. I’ll try or die trying. In recent times however, I’ve come to realize that the latter is more probable than I thought, because success in a large organization can never solely be based on individual effort and drive. I’d quite like to stay alive though, so is the answer that I concede defeat or that I try even harder?
Everyone of us is given a certain number of years on Earth, for us to spend whichever way we choose. We know however that there are really only two options in terms of the end destination – six feet under, or two thousand degrees within. So does it really matter whether we drift and cruise, or try and strive through it? I can see the cases for both but belong firmly to the second camp. 60 years – or more if I’m lucky – is really not a lot. I’m already two-third through.. I’m not hugely religious so don’t derive the meaning of this life from an eternal afterlife. To me, this life has its own meaning and that is the purpose we give it. Purpose can come in many forms – to serve your country a la LKY, to save mankind a la Elon Musk, to make your mother the happiest mother a la Shoko Kanazawa, to take care of your child a la Shoko’s mother. I’m simplifying it but you get the picture.
I want to take a small detour here. If you haven’t read about Shoko, please do. She’s a Japanese calligrapher with Down Syndrome. Her mother was racked by grief and guilt for having given birth to an imperfect child. Her father however decided that she was special and saw her gift in calligraphy. Her mother, a calligraphy teacher, eventually did too and devoted herself to teaching Shoko the art. Whilst Shoko may not always understand what she writes, she seems to understand her mother’s grief and practices hard, often accompanied by tears when she was a child, to make her happy. At a UN speech, Shoko said her mother was once the saddest mother on earth, but now she’s the happiest. Shoko’s father died when she was a teenager and her mother led her to believe that his soul had entered Shoko. This is why Shoko prays each time before she begins to write. I went to see her last weekend. She was immersed in the paper, ink and brush, trying to perfect each stroke. Her mother was focused on dabbing away the excess ink on the paper from her brush, to aid her achievement of perfection, that very Japanese concept and pursuit. It was a touching sight. Shoko and her mother’s devotion to each other and the art, each the other’s purpose in life.
Purposes don’t have to be grand. I don’t think Shoko and her mother’s purpose is any less than LKY’s or Elon Musk’s. Less in impact perhaps, but no less in value. I think it’s far worse not to have any purpose at all and just to drift through life, or to have one built on ultimately futile pursuits like wealth for its own sake.
Anyway, where was I?! Right, whether to die trying. As I explained in “Be myself”, I see who I am as a collective of all the roles I play. In terms of my relationships with others, I want to be the best I can be in each role, i.e., mother, partner, daughter, sister, friend, etc. In terms of my relationship with myself, I want to in the span of time given, discover who I can be, as defined by what I can do, what I can achieve, and what I can contribute. These two aspects, in summary, constitute my purpose.
Achievement is thus important to me, which is why I am the workaholic I am. It is however not about the size of my paycheck but what I am able to do. From managing a region to managing a global business, from solving smaller problems to solving bigger ones, from being a happy go lucky (actually have I ever been happy go lucky..?!) team member to intense firefighting leader. This progress of roles and responsibilities represents achievement to me. I want to give my all to see how far I can go. But alas, beyond a certain point, my all is not enough. In a large organization, you pretty much need everyone else to also give his or her all. Is that possible statistically? For so many people to share the same sense of urgency, and to be similarly motivated? And even if we achieve this statistical feat, there are also larger external forces at work, shaping the landscape in which we operate, that I cannot bend to my will no matter how strong that is. What is the appropriate response then? Accept that there can be honour in defeat or die trying? If you have any bright ideas, do share. In the meantime, please keep watching this blog. For if one day you stop hearing from me, it means I’ve died trying.